« Nanny State Quote Of the Day | Main | Reading Lefty Blogs Can Be Torture »
Immigration Reform School
Recent developments in Congress have made it very unlikely that the nation's immigration policies will be overhauled anytime soon. First, the Senate halted the ill advised Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (the DREAM Act). Then, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer announced that the House of Representatives would soon begin to work a drastically reduced schedule. The Democratically controlled Congress has not only failed to pass the legislation it committed to a year ago, it hasn't passed the minimum bills need to operate the government.
Although an immigration policy solution is doubtful, this does necessarily prevent progress. Reducing the influx of illegal immigrants is one of the more challenging (and expensive) tasks, and curbing the demand for cheap labor is at the core of this problem. Since tough regulations on companies are on hold, I'm a big proponent of aggressively pursuing technology solutions in industries where manual labor is currently the predominate or desired mechanism. One example of such an application is machinery that can harvest crops currently dependent on handpicking.
So while it's hard to achieve political solutions, technology can help with the immigration problem. However, this tech-centric approach requires Congressional support. As a nation, we spend tens of billions trying to curb illegal immigration, spending a fraction of this amount to address the root of the problem is certainly appropriate. Since Congress still has not finalized the appropriation bill that would incorporate such a change, there is time to accommodate this approach.
Handcrafted by Gindu on October 29, 2007 |
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572653ef00e54f0b29398833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Immigration Reform School:
Comments
I would be more inclined to consider it sleeping! 44 voted to alway a filibuster to stop it. over the majority voted for it to keep going - but that is not enough to end a filibuster. I've mapped the states out here: S2205 senate vote SVG map but have not yet compared it to what seats would be considered safe for the 2008 election.Posted by: Wayne | Oct 30, 2007 12:42:17 AM
Why do people today automatically assume that gov't must subsidize any kind of research to make it successful. Sigh. . . Once upon a time, farming equipment companies were able to invent corn harvesters, combines, etc., without subsidies.Posted by: Ralph G. | Oct 30, 2007 10:45:20 AM
Ralph, I believe industry will only pursue technologies that are in its financial interest. Since cheap labor is much more attractive than significant capital investment, industry will choose the former. Also, industry does not stand to reap the greatest benefits from such technology, the U.S. government does. So if left to market forces, I do not believe such technologies will be developed and matured.Posted by: Gindu | Oct 30, 2007 1:08:19 PM
I agree with Ralph. Other countries have mechanized some of the functions we still do manually in agriculture and some countries do manually what we do by machine. It all depends on what the local cost of labor is. If we do the right thing and stop using slave labor for some of these jobs the industries and employers will find it necessary to develop alternate and more efficient ways to get the job done. Government does not need to be involved. In fact, government involvement will casue more problems and cause costs and expenses to be higher than necessary. How do you get them out of it once they are in it?Posted by: Terri | Oct 30, 2007 11:56:25 PM

