Suitably Flip

A Bloodthirsty and Unapologetic Terrorist

This amatuer web ad will certainly never see the light of day, under an official McCain or RNC banner.

And that's too bad, because it's highly relevant to any undecided voters or Obama leaners who are succumbing to His HopeyChangey candidacy, and who have thus far glossed over his troublingly close connections to the worst of the worst that America has to offer.  (Scroll down if you want to skip to the ad, because I've got a rant that needs ranting.)

The notion that connecting Barack Obama to Bill Ayers is "dirty" politics or some kind of illegitimate "guilt by association" is simply false.  Obama simply is connected to Ayers, in very meaningful ways - socially, professionally, and politically.  If the inference from that association is damaging to Obama, so be it.

Despite demonstrably false, explicit campaign assertions to the contrary, it's well established that the two shared an office.  Despite demonstrably false, explicit campaign assertions to the contrary, Obama blurbed Ayers' book.  And, as the campaign concedes, the two served on the boards of two non-profits for several years.

Furthermore, despite the campaign's attempts to cast Ayers as simply a "guy from the neighborhood", this terrorist and his terrorist wife hosted Obama's political coming out party during his first political campaign and (very likely, according to as yet unnamed sources) have served as his kids' babysitter in the years since.  There's also strong circumstantial evidence that suggests that Ayers ghost-wrote Obama's first memoir (which Obama explicitly claims he wrote without assistance).

Given the proven extent of the relationship between this would-be President and a proud domestic terrorist and the candidate's unwillingness to acknowledge these connections (not to mention the likely, but as yet unproven, more damning connections that would illustrate ongoing bald-faced lies and an even more troublingly close association with such scum), is it possible that these relations run much deeper?  If so, is it possible that revelations of such might prove troubling to the country in coming years?

For those with a sense of history, let's consider a similar historical question.  In 1992, when the world had learned of just a few of Governor Clinton's extra-marital activities, what were the odds that during his Presidency, we'd learn of such filth, habitual abuse of power, and willingness to lie to the American people, that we'd witness the first-ever impeachment of an elected President?

Clinton's weakness was a combination of access to young girls, a perceived invulnerability, and a lack of respect for the truth.

Obama has clearly illustrated he shares the latter 2 of those 3.  While he hasn't shown a weakness for interns, he has well and truly lain bare a fondness for a much more dangerous sort.

Comments

A Bloodthirsty and Unapologetic Terrorist

This amatuer web ad will certainly never see the light of day, under an official McCain or RNC banner.

And that's too bad, because it's highly relevant to any undecided voters or Obama leaners who are succumbing to His HopeyChangey candidacy, and who have thus far glossed over his troublingly close connections to the worst of the worst that America has to offer.  (Scroll down if you want to skip to the ad, because I've got a rant that needs ranting.)

The notion that connecting Barack Obama to Bill Ayers is "dirty" politics or some kind of illegitimate "guilt by association" is simply false.  Obama simply is connected to Ayers, in very meaningful ways - socially, professionally, and politically.  If the inference from that association is damaging to Obama, so be it.

Despite demonstrably false, explicit campaign assertions to the contrary, it's well established that the two shared an office.  Despite demonstrably false, explicit campaign assertions to the contrary, Obama blurbed Ayers' book.  And, as the campaign concedes, the two served on the boards of two non-profits for several years.

Furthermore, despite the campaign's attempts to cast Ayers as simply a "guy from the neighborhood", this terrorist and his terrorist wife hosted Obama's political coming out party during his first political campaign and (very likely, according to as yet unnamed sources) have served as his kids' babysitter in the years since.  There's also strong circumstantial evidence that suggests that Ayers ghost-wrote Obama's first memoir (which Obama explicitly claims he wrote without assistance).

Given the proven extent of the relationship between this would-be President and a proud domestic terrorist and the candidate's unwillingness to acknowledge these connections (not to mention the likely, but as yet unproven, more damning connections that would illustrate ongoing bald-faced lies and an even more troublingly close association with such scum), is it possible that these relations run much deeper?  If so, is it possible that revelations of such might prove troubling to the country in coming years?

For those with a sense of history, let's consider a similar historical question.  In 1992, when the world had learned of just a few of Governor Clinton's extra-marital activities, what were the odds that during his Presidency, we'd learn of such filth, habitual abuse of power, and willingness to lie to the American people, that we'd witness the first-ever impeachment of an elected President?

Clinton's weakness was a combination of access to young girls, a perceived invulnerability, and a lack of respect for the truth.

Obama has clearly illustrated he shares the latter 2 of those 3.  While he hasn't shown a weakness for interns, he has well and truly lain bare a fondness for a much more dangerous sort.